Where were these guardians of justice during the Biden administration? – Redstate

Since the beginning of his term as president, Donald Trump has been exposed to a lot of gears, restraining orders and other legal procedures that prevent his measures to retract many things that Biden had done. Many of the things that Biden did is the reason that Kamala Harris got a severe victory in general, not to mention her inefficiency in particular. However, the results of the last elections clearly showed that most voters were not interested in Dei, the Federal Investigation Office/legal overcoming, and perhaps most important of all, the invasion of illegal foreigners and incitement, and encouraged them to neglect in terms of federalism on our southern borders. We did not like it, so we voted in a person who promised to restore the latter and eliminate the previous one. The progressive did not like it, so after they left the shock, they started doing the same things that they did with Trump before the elections: Lawfare. Although these things did not completely succeed for them, they seem to be great believers in stability. If, at first, do not succeed …





Everyone knows about Judge Boasberg and the Reyes Judge, who prohibited Trump’s exponiction measures against terrorist gangs and banned the fraudsters in the army. Last week, Trump called for the isolation of Boasberg and was reprimanded (at least indirectly) by Scotus John Roberts, to do so. Checks and balances, get them. Then you have a boycott judge, Jesse Foreman, trying to prevent the deportation of Mahmoud Khalil, a Middle East guest who has no right to be here except in the fun of the federal government. As a foreign citizen who actively supports terrorism on the campus of universities, its preaching is inconsistent with the government’s view, and it is now a a reason Celeber From the American left. Move, Luigi Mangion. So, so far, there are at least about 30, perhaps more, judicial orders against EOS Trump. More vulnerable to follow. More than ever was issued against any other president in history.


Related: Judge Psarterg rules Trump’s request

Pete HegSeth has a “modest suggestion” for an active judge who is fighting a ban in the transgender Pentagon


Well, I understand that Trump is loud and bold, and although I am sure he is running these measures in the legal past before it is issued, it is clear that many of them are still … loud and bold. It is controversial, no doubt. But are they legal? I think we will learn soon enough because the administration is currently going through the legal appeal process to find a treatment. This will take time, and there is no doubt that the bureaucracy that hates Trump’s courage. As for the isolation of judicial members, this will never happen unless the Republicans get 2/3 of the majority in the Senate and carry a majority in the House of Representatives two years from now. So, I don’t know what the problem is, but I have the next question about these federal judges who seem to have realized the authority they possess on the administration.





Where was these guardians to justice when Joe Biden called illegally and attractive millions and millions of “new Americans and illegal immigrants?” where? Why not, of course. It seems that these robes have a very little to say United States § 1325 (Based on Article 4, Section IV of the Constitution) and its undeniable violation. Violation has violated, and it will last for decades, other than the history of America mainly. Allow millions and millions of foreigners, then made citizens pay for them Everything From education, healthcare, drunk deaths, rape, murders, and any other crimes they committed while changing life for all of us at many different levels.

Now, Progs loves to use qualities from “those who work hard, good people looking for a better life” for “Who will choose our crops and make our families to the hotel?” (Note any progress in an unlikely event to read this: the latter seems a lot like “Who will choose our cotton and spy around the big house?”) Essentially, I do not care if they are good people; I only care if they are bad people because they should not be here in the first place. We have a lot of our good people and we don’t really need any new bad person.

However, where was these judges when Biden (or who was paying the handles behind the curtain) was busy with heat? This newly discovered obstacle and sudden respect for the rule of law has been absent over the past four years, and the impact that will have on this country will be generations. I can only wonder whether any of them could be suspended because of the lack of ratification. The only logic that I can follow is that either my party or incompetent, and none of these things will be presented long before Federal Judicial ConferenceFederal Judicial Policy Making Authority. According to Law of behavior and judicial deficit of 1980The judge can undergo a complaint and reprimand to work with bias, mental disability, or unable to do his job fairly. And again, I think that if you will not impose the border law (when the problem is presented to you), this is either because you are my party or incompetent. This committee cannot shoot judges, but they can rebuke them and rule that they should voluntarily retire. All he might do is put a scratch on their legacy, but at least do so. If these people are weeds, some may harm. who knows. Perhaps the reason for giving them when they are called to the manager’s office is that “well, President Biden has never issued EO or a directive that we could be able to get off properly. He never announced orally or in writing an order he said effectively,” the borders are now open to all foreign citizens; Come here “.”





No, he did not. He is just (and again, maybe another person) called for a friendly bureaucracy that knows what his desires are, and he went to tours to welcome all our new friends, giving them food, housing and flying. From that, all the things that flowed since the left clearly understood that the great replacement theory was to become the latest for the first time. And, Jolie, what do you know? It was membership. It has happened somewhat, and no one, not even Biden, can stop it. The power of nature …

What I really find, really annoying is that these judges who are withheld now we have voted for their sacred respect for the law did not have enough respect to ask what they saw in the news and in front of their faces every day. They have never thought about issuing any type of TRO, a judicial order against internal security or the protection of customs borders. Protection of customs borders? Was not these men victims of all of this? Yes, but they had to obtain their orders from somewhere, and to submit a judicial order against them that would have forced the government’s hand. You may have revealed at least the next level of fraud. But no one did that. And Biden? Does Back not stop with him? If we were able to agree on this (and yes, I know that it is not originally, but TRO or a judicial order was still demanding to respond), then where did all this newly discovered judicial courage came to challenge the White House? Well, I think he came from Donald Trump. From the institutional hostility comes amazing things.





So, what can the new administration learn from this? I assume that they can determine that the new policy must be implemented in the dark with a wink and gesture ….“Just do that … you know what the president means.” I think they can also learn that when the oath gives up power, our federal circuits judges have the same tools that must be used to prevent the will of the Democratic President and confusion. I do not defend it because it spoils a system that we all believe in, but on the other hand, progressive depend on their interior. Trump, in his last term and nearly 80 years, can simply ignore these provisions and enforce his own orders anyway. Joe Biden challenged the rule of Scotos and Sameh 48 billion dollars In the debts of student loans, nothing happened to him/his administration. There is no federal judge – neither on the circle nor the highest court there – it seems to have anything to say about it. Well, why should Trump not only do the same and ignore them?

Because it is tempting as it might be, Trump has more integrity than that, and he knows that he will help destroy the system more than it is already. Therefore, it passes the appeal process and tries to correct errors, and rely on the same judicial system that spoiled it in the first place. I just hope that there are still some good judges remaining in this complex.


Editor’s note: Unaccompanied Federal Judges suffocate President Trump’s agenda and insult the will of the people

We helped expose the judges out of control of the dead control of President Trump’s mandate for change. Join Redstate VIP and use promotional code Fight For 60 % of your membership.



Leave a Comment