Phoenix – The highest court in Arizona has established a pair of synthesis created from artificial intelligence to provide news about every ruling issued by the judges, on the occasion of what is believed to be the first example in the United States of the state court system. artificial intelligence To build more human -like characters to communicate with the audience.
A court in Florida uses moving to help visitors move on its website, but the Supreme Court of Arizona draws a new area with the creation of Victoria and Daniel. Made of pixels units, the avatar has a different function in that it is a face for the news coming from the court just as the spokesperson will do from the body and blood – but faster.
The use of artificial intelligence has touched almost every profession and discipline, as it grows dramatically in recent years and shows unlimited potential when it comes to simple things such as online or complex searches such as brain surgery. For officials of the Supreme Court of Arizona, their artificial intelligence project is rooted in the desire to enhance confidence and confidence in the judicial system.
There was a protest outside the Capitol building last April, calling for the pre -judicial judges of two judges after the Supreme Court of Arizona Ruling This is the law of the civil war Almost all abortion operationsExcept when a woman’s life is in danger, it can be imposed. Emotions erupted on my side problem.
When the President of the Supreme Court, Ann Timer, seized the court last summer, she made the public trust in a major column for her platform. She was already thinking about ways to reach the public using digital media for a few years, and the ruling on miscarriage, among other rulings, helped her to enhance the idea that the court should be part of the narration where people learn about opinions and what it means.
“We are better serving the audience by saying, well, we have issued this decision,” she said. “Now, let’s help you understand what it is.”
Timmer told the Associated Press earlier this year that if the court is forced to abort again, it will deal with publishing information differently. In an interview with Wednesday, she said that a press statement and Avatar video would have better helped the audience to understand the legal foundations of the long decision – perhaps including what he did not do, which some of his abuse said.
“We got a lot of violent reaction to that and perhaps they deserve it, in terms of how we can doubt that people do not understand what we did when we did not really do enough to give a simplified version,” she said in the January interview, explaining that people want to know the basis for court decisions and what they can do, like a legitimate jurisdiction of any changes in the law, will support their positions.
Democratic ruler Katie Hobbes The cancellation occurred From the last ban, and in November, Arizona voters agreed to a constitutional amendment Expanding the scope of access to miscarriage Even the embryonic point of the fetus.
It was created with a program called Explegy, Daniel and Victoria in some way that publishes court news. Videos, which include one or another for each ruling, are published by the Supreme Court, and can be used to access justice projects, community programs and civil education information in the future.
The court has sent publications since October to summarize and explain the rulings. After seeing success with the versions, I started exploring options to transfer this information through the video.
Court spokesman Alberto Rodriguez said that the gods created from artificial intelligence were the most effective way to produce videos and obtain information. He said that producing a video clip can usually take hours, but a video created by AI is ready in about 30 minutes. Rodriguez said in a press statement that the court may have presented more correspondents who were created from artificial intelligence in the future.
Justice that legal opinion authors also describe a press release, must be approved to formulate the entire seat. Rodriguez said that justice is then working with the court’s communications team to formulate a scenario for the avatar – the gods do not explain the decisions or opinions of the original court.
Rodriguez said that the names of Daniel and Victoria and her physical manifestations were designed to represent a wide range of people. He said they are not supposed to explode because real people and the court emphasize the origins of artificial intelligence while evacuating responsibility. Rodriguez said that the court explores various emotional delivery, rhythms and speech, as well as the Spanish translations of the gods.
Masson Courtz, a clinical coach at the Cyberlaw Clinic at Harvard Law Faculty at Berkeman Clean Internet Center & Society has described the new employees in court as “very realistic.” Although their voices might give them, he said that some people can be deceived by thinking that Daniel and Victoria are real reporters if viewers only read translations and look at personal movements and facial expressions.
Courtz also said it would be better to display the liability evacuation language in describing the text of the videos prominently.
He said: “You want to make it difficult for someone to announce unintentionally or unintentionally responsible.”
Ashili Landrom, associate professor at Walter Kronkate College for Press and Public Communication at Arizona State University, said the gods feel machines. She said that the coordination that mimics real dialogue and storytelling may be more attractive than reading Amnesty International for a press statement.
She said: “Because it is not only about the use of artificial intelligence or even creating videos, but about doing this in a swinging manner with the masses.”
Still, it’s a thin line. She said that attractive properties can help build confidence over time, but the danger is that the content may seem biased.
adxpro.online