Choosing the correct frame is the key to developing your application without headache. The wrong choice can lead to a messy code, high costs and continuous reformulation. Angular is designed to deal with growth, facilitating the transition from a small project to a large -to -development product. If you want to avoid common scaling problems, this article is for you. One of the main decisions that the company or company must make is to determine a set of technologies that must be used to build an application. There are many ways to deal with this, and one of the largest options is to choose the right frame.
Hello! My name is Tom Samikovsky, and I am a great software engineer. Throughout my career, I worked on both startups and applications of large -scale institutions that serve millions of users and have been developed by hundreds of front end engineers. This experience gave me a unique view of what it succeeds – and what no – when it comes to building developed applications.
Currently, we have many options, such as frames based on the RECT Library, such as Next.js; Vue and its ecosystem; And the angle, among other things.
Today, I will focus on what makes Angular great if you want to expand your application. Through scaling, I mean preparing an application in a way that allows it to move smoothly from MVP to a completely faltering product and from a small team from 2-3 of the front end developers to a wide range with the spread of 30-50 from the front end developers through multiple teams, and the development and maintenance of the application on a large scale.
If your service or product depends on digital services, this is an inevitable future. As your business grows, your application must keep up with the market demand and serve the needs of customers and users. Early, it is important to create your application to be flexible enough to accommodate the axes on the road to the state of the unicorn – without reaching a dead end of the costs of high old development.
Angular is a great option to build developmentable applications, and today, I will share some practical ideas about the reason.
1. If you want your business to grow, choose a working framework with it
When assessing tools to build an application, we can classify them based on their complexity. For example, you can write applications that work at full capacity using JavaScript only, without any frame or library. However, this means that you must deal with everything that the frameworks and libraries usually provide. As a result, the complexity of such an application will be the highest.
The developers will need to solve the problems that have already been addressed by the current tools, forcing them to work at a low level instead of focusing on the logic of work and user experience. This makes development more expensive and at risk. On the positive side, developers will have full control over each aspect of the application.
On the other end of the spectrum, you can choose the tools with very low complexity, such as the non -code platforms. This approach can reduce development costs because the non -code tools allow creating the application with a little coding. However, the comparison is the lack of flexibility-if the tool does not support an advantage, it may be simply unable to implement it. This inherent restriction makes low toxic tools not suitable for developed and advanced applications.
Frames and libraries on the scale of complexity
Libraries and frameworks are also suitable for this complexity, and the choice of the correct path depends on the complexity level required by your project.
React is a library, which means it provides a low -level solution for building user interface components. To create a frame -like structure with a React, you need either to use Next.js along with additional libraries or to manually assemble your tools set. Each preparation based on a unique reaction-it differs from one company to another and a team to a team. The elasticity of this approach allows to switch tools while maintaining the basis intact, but it also comes with a negative aspect: developers must manage low -level fears, ensuring that all dual dependencies are operating together.
Angular, on the other hand, is a framework, which means that it attracts low -level fears so that developers can work at a higher level of abstraction. In the past, Angular had a great complexity due to excessive stereotypes in engineering, exhausting interactivity, and boring Templating model. However, modern improvements-such as independent ingredients, composition of the new template, and signs-have re-located the corner location as a low-running tool with a low entry barrier.
Why is the corner better to expand the scope
Angular learning is now easier than mastering the various frames based on React. Since Angular follows a unified approach, developers can switch smoothly between different angle projects and application sections while maintaining productivity.
React works well for small, simple and MVPS applications, where flexibility is an advantage. However, where the application’s scales are determined, the RECT approach challenges begin at the low level, which leads to high development costs.
On the contrary, Angular supports MVP development while providing tools needed for conversion and expansion without the need to make expensive architectural repairs. This makes Angular a better option to build developed applications from the start.
2. Simling from one developer to one hundred
For developable applications, it is imperative that the companies that provide them will grow. You can start a Saas Transportation service using artificial intelligence to write a simple application for transportation and scheduling. If you gain experience in this process and find a position, your MVP application can successfully enter the market.
What many technical founders lack is that to expand the scope of business, they will need to expand the scope of the problems they allow for their customers. For example, people who transport goods are also likely to use the transportation of ships and may need to be packaging and sorting solutions. With the growth of these needs, companies that use your application will want to integrate as many of their operations as possible to simplify operations. This also means dealing with users with different roles and permissions.
Suddenly, you may find yourself buried under customer requests, which inevitably leads to employing more developers and organizing their work to deal with all the important advantages of business efficiently.
Organizing teams and expansion symbol
There is a great way to organize each of the development and symbol teams about specific types of processes, for example:
- Ship Operations Team
- Cargo control team
- Railways operations team
- Mobilization and sorting team
Each of these teams is responsible for a specific vertical operation and oversees the development of application features related to this part of the work. In practice, each sub -system can be found within the application within different list sections.
From a technical perspective, this means that feature elements, such as ingredients, processing data and assistant facilities should be collected, together at the base of the code. This clear separation of property guarantees maintenance and expansion.
Both React and Angular allow the creation of features in functional evidence. However, the angle previously relied on NGMDULes to regulate features, which is a parallel structure that is now disposed of in favor of independent components. This transformation simplifies the reorganization of the code, which facilitates the reversal of the company’s organizational structure within the base of the blade.
In addition, the slow -loading built -in on Angular, shaking the improved trees in the latest versions, and signs -based performance improvements make the corner applications now feel great and more responsive, even in slow internet connections. This is a significant improvement compared to the ancient days of the angle.
3. Performance should not sacrifice the user experience
In life, as in programming, when you try to deal with a lot of things simultaneously, none of them are properly performed. React is a great example of this. It provides low -level development, which can enable the edge performance. However, when we look at React applications in practice, we see some defects.
When developers have to manage low -level fears, they have less time to focus on user experience. On the contrary, when they give the user experience priority, they have less time to improve performance. The result? The interaction of applications that are difficult to use due to the dodes of the user interface, slow, or – often – both.
The main work questions when scaling
From the perspective of work, the most important questions are:
- Can we provide this feature?
- How much will it cost?
- When will you be ready?
- Will you work properly?
In fact, companies operate with budget restrictions and time, which means that development features should be logical from the work perspective. Regardless of the technological stack that you choose, to stay competitive, you need:
- Delivery of features quickly
- Maintaining low development costs
- Make sure the features are done correctly
- Conclusions in development
These restrictions are often forced to make sacrifices, such as:
- Reducing the feature of the feature
- Delaying access and improving performance
- Leave the user interface drivers for future repairs
- In the end, you want to choose a set of tools that reduce risk in all these areas, allowing you to provide features on time and within the budget.
How the angular reduces the risk of development
A great example of Angular approach to reduce complexity is the prevention of memory leakage. A memory leak occurs when the application failed to launch the memory after the objects are no longer needed, which slowly slows the performance until the application becomes unusable or disrupted.
With references, Angular is now automatically canceled from Observables, eliminating a common source of memory leaks. Previously, developers had to manually manage subscriptions, which were often ignored. The more developers who need to be concerned about these low -level fears, the greater time to focus on providing features, which are their primary work.
Angular, as a business framework, is designed to deal with these complications so that developers can focus on building great products, not fighting unnecessary technical debts.
summary
Choosing the correct frame is necessary for long -term growth. Although React provides flexibility, it requires low -level complications that can slow down development with the scope of the difference. On the other hand, Angular unifies architecture, making it easier for developers to cooperate and maintain large applications.
Through compact performance improvements, automatic memory management, and organized expansion, Angular reduces the risk of development while allowing companies to provide features quickly and efficiently. If you are based on size, Angular provides stability and flexibility to grow without slowing technical debts.
It should not mean limiting your application, chaos, high costs, or endless re -creation. Do you want to create an angular app that ranges smoothly from starting to the institution? Get my free review menu now, and make sure your application design, efficiency and success in the long run!
adxpro.online