Text: Trump’s anger in Canada darker – this is “not a joke”

I think there is harm to the relationship, if not between governments, between the citizens of Canada and the citizens of America when our opposition party is, The main media, social media, Trump critics [say]and There he goes again. There is an important thing to say what he does wrong and we will not allow him to do so.

Sargement: To your point of view, I want to read some voting numbers because they appear, at least when requested by opinion polls, people find these things very annoying. The new Quinnipiac survey finds that only 42 percent of voters agree to deal with Trump for foreign policy, and 53 percent do not agree. Only 36 percent agree to Trump’s dealings with trade with Canada and 58 percent do not agree. Only 31 percent say Trump’s position on Canada is correct. Meanwhile, in the new CNN survey, Trump’s approval of foreign affairs is from 42 to 58. So, it is fixed between the smart correspondents and the consultant category: voters are not interested in any of this, so these numbers do not matter. But what if they care, right? S.R may need care, and they may be made for care. Perhaps it can be made to address this as not a joke or influence, to use these easy clichies. How can something clearly explain that Trump is not present to the presidency of the presidency not to be a central in our political discourse?

Beutler: Yes, it takes a concentrated opposition, right? I sympathize with the instinct for not feeding the perception that Trump wants to create himself as a strong leader that people should fear. There is a value in mocking it to take this position. If the Democrats have a consensus leader, a presidential candidate, or any person who was a party’s fully -science spokesman, it would be good to say B.Oth, The way people who were better for us in the world treated in the world, but also how is your plan to take over? How is the fifty -first state? Oh, you failed to do so too? It is a duality that I think the Democratic Party is able to hit. They do not do this for the reasons we just discussed, but I think there are scenarios that are not very far away This can bring our political policy and speech to a closer consensus with your point of view, that this is something that the Americans may actually care or should be interested in, until we stop blowing it.