Slip: I cannot draw, so Amnesty International used this to create this: Robot (disguised as a nice creature from the Gibli world), killing the next emerging artist.
If you compare the written work created by artificial intelligence three years ago to what Chatgpt created last year, then the difference is the confusing mind. And if you compare the artistic work created by artificial intelligence six months ago what can happen today, then the difference is … well, what can I say, nothing is revolutionary.
When Openai launched the new ChatGPT images, it took only two days until social media explodes with GHibli -like deposits for everything from celebrities to themes to personal photos.
Studio Ghibli has a very distinct artistic style, thanks to the approach of the co -founder Hayao Miyazaki, which focuses on hand -drawn techniques. Tires are manually stripped by artists (such as Kazuo Oga), and all characters have traits that are formed from the human touch of the artist.
It is an unambiguous style that provokes a feeling of nostalgia, innocence and beauty – an experience related to people at a deep emotional level. Anyone who watched the MIYAZAKI movie can immediately determine the GHibli style, specifically this recognition that makes it very magical when people see themselves, or even themes, which are presented in this familiar world.
But not everyone is happy in this direction …
Some art lovers and creators expressed their fears and for a good reason. The effects of art created from artificial intelligence disturb people, but for anyone who was noticing, the question of whether artificial intelligence will destroy artists and ways of living people is not one of “if,” but “when.”
Your blood may be boiled, but I am already in the fifth stage of sadness (acceptance) and has already surrendered! \
Therefore, I think it is acceptable to create pictures in the GHibli studio style to give yourself some joy because there is Never be ghibli or Pixar. If we think about what we have today and what may come during the next five or ten years, it is clear that there is no room for the next emerging artist with a unique feeling of creativity.
In any creative field now, the profession is now risky, and there is no way for the learner to advance to bone or be a great artist that provides good when it is possible to produce “good enough” in a small part of the cost.
As artificial intelligence continues, it should be a genius from the beginning to secure work in many fields. There will hardly be any room for entry or writer at the average level, programmer, designer, photographer, artist, or model to find a decent work.
Currently, artificial intelligence is already able to produce work in about 80 % of the level of medium human quality, and it can do so in a small part of the cost. Imagine where we will be within five years. Most companies are likely to choose business created from artificial intelligence that amounts to 7.5/10, due to a much lower cost, rather than paying in addition to the 10/10 version created for a person when the difference can not be distinguished often of the average person.
Let’s stop a moment to think about the amount of time and resources that entered into creating one scene in the GHibli studio. The scene of the Wind Rises (2013) took up the animation for a year and three months to complete it. Why was a lot of time invested? Because it was the Ghibli movie, and this dedication is what determines the studio legacy. But this level of investment will never spend on the next emerging artist, and not when AI can provide good results enough faster and cheaper.
Once again, don’t focus on what we have today, think about where we will be within five years. The art profession will be very risky for the next generation, as most companies will not pay you if you are less than average.
The amateurs will preserve the creative spark alive, but art as a profession? This is simply not worth doing. No work will fund the creativity or uniqueness of an unknown artist at the cost of profit margins when AI can achieve decent results for a small part of the cost. I do not blame companies for this; It is simply an economic issue. The investment of resources in an artist in the hope that they will one day become the next great is no longer a sound strategy. There may be criticism of capitalism here but this is a completely different story.
For those who are still in denial, artificial intelligence does not need to be better than a skilled person; You should be good enough for your customers so that you don’t care. In addition, not all people are skilled anyway.
If you love art, whether it is originated or scenes, embrace the last Hala and the joy that the GHibli studio brings and its style, because there will be no another great artist in the future. You may not agree, but I will devote some pictures because I am treating this historic moment for art, and knowledge of things will never be the same. Even if you do not participate, another person will do that, and there is no stop.
For me, this is a feeling of sadness because we admire the patterns of pioneering human art, perhaps for the last time.
TL; Dr: AI exists to expand the gap between the working class and the wealthy while eliminating jobs. Large studios protection are our least fears now. The genie cannot be placed in the bottle. After imagining what will come in the next five years, it is better to accept and embrace this final celebration of art with the next Miazaki stopping.
Postscript
My opinion on some of the criticisms and clear questions that may arise from this article.
“Whoever creates these things has no idea of ​​pain at all. Inclusion of the same life” ???
Although I really think technology companies are wrong in stealing everyone’s work, including MIYAZAKI, it will also be wrong to determine the MIYAZAKI quote Out of context. This comment was made after watching a trial show of a terrifying zombie -like creature with strange movements created through artificial intelligence In 2016. He also said that hideous coma movements reminded him of friends with disabilities, and he believed this was an insult. It is clear that his comments were specifically in the context of this illustration and cannot be considered his position on AI A AI after 9 years. As of now, there was no statement from the studio, and we do not know how to feel about all this. Artificial intelligence companies are likely to hate his style, but does he also hate fans to create personal photos because they love his style?
Do you not have to blame and be ashamed of people for using this?
As is always the case, anger is more directed towards ordinary people by those who feel intellectually superior. It is easy to punch down the belt. So, instead of protesting our ovens, people find it easier to criticize and hate ordinary people.
The problem is not ordinary people who generate nice pictures of their entertainment; The problem is that companies stole everyone’s work to train artificial intelligence and get people out of their jobs. The problem is when these works are used (such as Studio Ghibli, which has always strengthened peace) to create hate speech and political propaganda.
No common people use GHibli style and demanded it as their own original style. It is an inspiration and honor. If you think this is a mistake, did you also say the same thing if an artist reduced something in a popular style as a honor? Is it an insult to Michael Jackson to make the moon corridor badly? Is it an insult to the original singer if you sing a bad song in front of my friends?
Is art created from artificial intelligence not art? What if it depends on my unique input?
Many people may argue that the banana recorded on the wall is not an art, but people pushed millions for such things. Therefore, art cannot be defined by borders. If the digital artist has a personality in mind and uses the current vectors and elements that the drawing tool provides to create their work faster, is not this art? If this art is, then why is the art if someone brings his imagination to life using artificial intelligence? Both have the same result, with the difference in technology only. Yes, the art style is a remix of what happened before, but does all handicraft artists use original artistic patterns without doing any derivative work?
If you say that AI Art is still art, why do you say that art is dying today?
Art will always be in a form. What dies today is the birth of the leading art patterns because:
- It is simply no longer a good professional choice for most of them to follow up.
- Companies will not invest resources in creating any specific work for the following types (the following MIYAZAKI) because it is not worth it. When it is possible to create well enough at 1/100 cost, most companies will avoid investing in traditional methods.
“Photography did not kill the drawing and did not kill digital art traditional art.”
Yes, photography did not kill the painting, but is the demand for paintings the same now as it was during the French Revolution? Also, digital art has not eliminated traditional art. It greatly reduces its value. Does people pay 10x more for human digital art when art of artificial intelligence can do this task? Forget people, will companies pay?
Will art become a more installment product?
Yes, the valuable scarcity is paid, but it will be booked for the better only. Although hands -with hands are now expensive, most of the hand workers in India have been displaced. The same will happen to art and other fields. Unlike the past, when high -quality action gets the top of the dollar while the medium action still gains a fee for living, the future in which the mediococcal intelligence exceeds is not only a room for the best that maintains a profession in many areas. This also means that those who imitate will not have a profession because artificial intelligence is doing all the tradition now!
Can we stop this?
No, there is no placement of this genie in the bottle. If a country is organizing or restricting artificial intelligence, some other countries will make it. Even if there is a scenario, there are open copies of several tools that can be operated locally by companies. In addition, remember that companies control governments around the world. If they want artificial intelligence, they will use artificial intelligence. It may be unfortunate, but there is no other way!
adxpro.online