Within three days, I moved from 1) from moderately discomfort from the possibility of spoiling my phone at a distance to 2) accepting that Google was (probably) to do it for my own safety, and it was committed to making things right to 3) moisturizing Google to destroy my device and then use a hostile program and collect data. ” Perhaps this was not the impression in which Google hopes to leave people’s minds when the Pixel 4A update is released.
It can be expensive cheap
The update itself does not seem part of a plan to spy on us or to extract revenues, but rather to maintain the safety of people. The company tried to treat pain with the options that felt, on the surface, with reason, especially given the fact that the batteries are known as consumable organisms that decompose over time. I had three solid years of service with 4A, which was not particularly expensive to start.
However, I blame Google In general For the situation. Flexibility of the approach, the unnecessary options for easy use in specific countries, and technical support to use external sources – these are all the distinctive features of global technology promoters today.
It is more efficient, than the perspective worldwide Technical solutions on better local options, by choosing an external email support, by trying to avoid fraud (and employee time) by preventing program changes, by requesting Users To jump across your hoops, by sticking to very sensitive information because they make things easier in your end.
While this is a specific logical matter, it is not interesting to obtain this type of “efficiency”. When everything goes smoothly, it is good – but whenever there is a problem, or questions arise, these types of “effective and developed methods” usually mean “you are about to be exposed to prevalence.”
In the end, Google is ready to pay $ 50, but this money comes at a cost of its own. I am not ready to pay with my time or with the risks of my financial information, and I will grow increasingly to companies that offer a better experience, which is more concerned with data privacy, which builds with high -quality ingredients, which care about customers well.
There is no perfect company, of course, and this approach costs a little more, which opposes my strong desire to get a lot on everything. I must continue to re -learn the old lesson – as I am again with this failure 4A – that the cheap gear is not always the best value in the long run.
adxpro.online