A federal judge closed the Ministry of Governmental efficiency in Illon Musk from accessing social security records, and decided that the process was the process of seizing unjustified data.
Judge Ellen Lipton Hollande, in a decision issued on Thursday from the US Batta Timor’s Court of County, prevented the Musk team from recovering personal definition information (PII) from the Social Security Administration (SSA), saying they failed to provide any good reason for the request.
The judgment is prohibited by the SSA Commissioner, the Chargé d’Affaires, the LELAND DUDEK, the great information staff, and all SSA employees from allowing DOGE to enter any system that contains personal data. Holland described Dog’s request that he was overlooked, accused of conducting a “hunting trip” without clear justification. The court also ordered Doug and its subsidiaries to delete all the personal data they have already obtained since January 20.
Holland: Doge had no reason to access the bloc data
Hollande explained that the Musk team has never explained why they needed unrestricted entry to SSA records. The defendant’s judge criticized the pursuit of a huge set of special details, including social security numbers, recruitment date, tax files, medical records, and banking information.
“The defendants, along with experts called the Duwaij team, never specify or explain the reason for Dog to unlimited access to the entire SSA record systems, thus exposing personal, confidential, sensitive and private information that millions of Americans entrusted to their government,” Holland. “ books.
Holland also referred to the hypocrisy of the Musk team. While Doge Affiliats kept their identities hidden, citing private concerns, who were calling at the same time to reach the private records of millions of Americans.
She wrote: “The defense does not seem to participate in the privacy interest in millions of Americans whom SSA records have been available to DOGE companies, without their consent.”
The lawsuit that led to the ruling was filed by many trade unions and retired groups, including the US State Federation, AFSCME), the alliance for retired Americans, and the American Union of Teachers (AFT). They argued that allowing Dog in SSA databases would be a severe violation of privacy and exposing personal data for possible use.
Prosecutors are called the White House, prosecutors say the ruling supports privacy rights
The White House was not lost at any time in response. Harrison Fields, a Trump administration spokesman, criticized the verdict, described Holland as a “radical left” and accused her of prohibiting efforts to improve government competence.
“The president will continue to search for all the legal treatments available to ensure that the American people will will be done,” Fields said in a statement.
SSA confessed to the verdict, simply, “We will work to comply with the court’s order.”
Hollande assumed another problem with the justification of Dog, noting that they failed to suggest any targeted approach. Instead, they argued that they needed to “update” and “prevent fraud”, but they have never explained a necessary and unrestricted reason for SSA records.
“The government is simply repeating the need to update the system and detect fraud,” she wrote. “The way to do this is like hitting a fly with a heavy hammer.”
According to Holland, the prosecutors “may succeed” in proving that Dog’s actions have violated both the Privacy Law and the Administrative Procedures Law.
Richard Viesta, CEO of the coalition of retired Americans, praised the court’s decision, saying it is a necessary step to protect personal data.
“We are grateful because the court has taken strong measures to protect the personal data of every American,” said Viesta. “The elderly should be able to trust that the Social Security Administration will protect their personal information and prevent it from falling into the wrong hands.”
Cryptopolitan Academy: soon – a new way to earn a negative income with Defi in 2025. Learn more
adxpro.online