“The risk of turmoil” recognizes NHS repair

Wes Street Minister of Health said that there is a “risk of disturbance” in NHS because he is trying to fix the service and reduce waste, but he promised long -term improvements.

On Thursday, Streeting NHS England, a public administrative body, announced to save money and give the ministers more control of health services.

The work government expects the move to take two years and provide hundreds of millions of pounds that can be spent on NHS services on the front lines.

She appeared on the BBC program on Sunday with the Laura Quinsburg program, and defended the reforms, but he admitted that there would be challenges.

When asked about the influence on patient care, he said: “Of course there are always the costs of the introduction. Yes, there is always the risk of disturbance.”

The street said that the former health trustees “were not ready to confront these types of challenges” and argued that NHS England “was created for the ideal shield of politicians.”

He said: “I saw waste, inefficiency and duplication. So of course we must follow it.”

When asked about a second time if patient care will be disabled due to NHS’s reorganization, the streets promised to make improvements and said waiting lists for treatment already.

The government said the main reasons for the cancellation of NHS England are “lowering bureaucracy” and reforming how health services work.

It was called NHS England, “The Great Quango in the World” – the term used to describe the organizations funding to the public with the ARM length from the government

Currently, NHS England oversees the health service, working with the government to agree to financing and priorities, as well as monitor the performance of local NHS services.

Under the changes, the organization will be brought to the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare (DHSC), which is headed by the street.

Reforms will not affect anyone’s arrival to NHS, while the health service remains for free when using.

The government said it expects about half of the jobs in NHS England and DHSC to go – about 9,000 administrative roles.

The President of NHS, England, Richard Mendegs, said that he does not differ with the cancellation of the organization, In his first interview Since the announcement of changes.

But in his talk to the BBC, he said that Pak will now stop with the ministers, saying: “There will be no separate vehicle that can be directed [at] To say this is what he made. “

Writing in telegraphThe street suggested to hide that England was “the beginning, not the end” and said it would continue to “reduce the amplified bureaucracy.”

Health Minister Beni Dash, who became president of NHS England at the beginning of this month, assigned a review of the bureaucracy.

Some organizations supervised by the Ministry of Health include the Care Quality Committee, the Health Security Agency in the United Kingdom and the National Institute for Excellence in the field of care and care.

Under this is a group of smaller public bodies at the regional and local level.

Speaking to the BBC, the street that the street will be drawn by the Bureaucratic NHS organizations that he considers immediate, but suggested that there be an “excessive organization” of NHS services.

He said that the leaders of the NHS front lines told him, “They often receive a set of orders – sometimes contradictory and competing requirements – from the Ministry of Health, and from NHS England and from a wide range of organizers in this field.”

He said that the simplification would lead to the success of NHS and was “following the bureaucracy, and not the people who work on it.”

He added: “Of course, I cannot teach sugar the fact that there will be a large number of job losses and we will want to make sure that we are dealing with people fairly, and support them properly through this process.”

The conservatives welcomed the action in re -managing the health service under ministerial control, but they warned the Labor Party “cannot hide if things worse.”

Liberal Democrats said the government should ensure that NHS England does not reduce “it has no negative effects on patient care quality” and urged the ministers to complete a social welfare review.

Leave a Comment